Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alderman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kanbur, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
Right arrow D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

UNITARY VERSUS COLLECTIVE MODELS OF THE HOUSEHOLD: IS IT TIME TO SHIFT THE BURDEN OF PROOF?

Harold Alderman, Pierre-André Chiappori, Lawrence Haddad, John Hoddinott and Ravi Kanbur

Most development objectives focus on the well-being of individuals. Policies are targeted to increase the percentage of individuals who avoid poverty, who can read, who are free from hunger and illness, or who can find gainful employment. Individual welfare, however, is based in large part on a complex set of interactions among family members.

Until recently most policy analyses implicitly viewed the household as having only one set of preferences. This assumption has been a powerful tool for understanding household behaviour, such as the distribution of tasks and goods. But a growing body of evidence suggests that this view is an expedience that comes at considerable, and possibly avoidable, cost. The article argues that more effective policy instruments will emerge from analyzing the processes by which households balance the diverse interests of their members.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OXF ECON PAPHome page
S. Ghosh and R. Kanbur
Male wages and female welfare: private markets, public goods, and intrahousehold inequality
Oxf. Econ. Pap., January 1, 2008; 60(1): 42 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 WORLD BANK ECON REVHome page
D. Stifel and H. Alderman
The "Glass of Milk" Subsidy Program and Malnutrition in Peru
World Bank Econ. Rev., January 1, 2006; 20(3): 421 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rationality and SocietyHome page
Y. Youm and E. O. Laumann
The Effect of Structural Embeddedness on the Division of Household Labor: A Game-Theoretic Model Using a Network Approach
Rationality and Society, May 1, 2003; 15(2): 243 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.