© 1995 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
other |
THE DANGERS OF DECENTRALIZATION
Demand for decentralization is strong throughout the world. But the benefits of decentralization are not as obvious as the standard theory of fiscal federalism suggests, and there are serious drawbacks that should be considered in designing any decentralization program. An analysis of these dangers makes it easier to understand some of the real choices. These choices are not so much whether to decentralize in general, but rather what functions to decentralize, in which sectors, and in which regions. In many cases the problem is not so much whether a certain service should be provided by a central, regional, or local government, but rather how to organize the joint production of the service by the various levels.
In many—if not most—cases, such measures have an enormous potential and could, if properly designed and implemented, significantly improve the efficiency of the public sector. Decentralization measures are like some potent drugs, however: when prescribed for the relevant illness, at the appropriate moment and in the correct dose, they can have the desired salutary effect; but in the wrong circumstances, they can harm rather than heal. This article looks at some of the negative effects of decentralization in the hope that a better understanding of its dangers will contribute to a wiser application of potentially desirable decentralization programs.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Martinez-Vazquez and M.-H. Yao Fiscal Decentralization and Public Sector Employment: A Cross-Country Analysis Public Finance Review, September 1, 2009; 37(5): 539 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. R. Hankla When is Fiscal Decentralization Good for Governance? Publius, September 1, 2009; 39(4): 632 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. R. Aiyede The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism and the Dilemma of Constructing a Developmental State in Nigeria International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, June 1, 2009; 30(3): 249 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Martinez-Vazquez and A. Timofeev A fiscal perspective of state rescaling Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, March 1, 2009; 2(1): 85 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ravallion Decentralizing Eligibility for a Federal Antipoverty Program: A Case Study for China World Bank Econ. Rev., January 30, 2009; (2009) lhn023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. N. Herath Decentralization of Governance and Economic Development: The Sri Lankan Experience after Establishment of Provincial Councils South Asia Economic Journal, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 157 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. I. Gonzalez Political Power, Fiscal Crises, and Decentralization in Latin America: Federal Countries in Comparative Perspective (and some Contrasts with Unitary Cases) Publius, February 11, 2008; (2008) pjn001v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Rosefielde and N. Vennikova Fiscal federalism in Russia: a critique of the OECD proposals Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2004; 28(2): 307 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. O'Neill Decentralization as an Electoral Strategy Comparative Political Studies, November 1, 2003; 36(9): 1068 - 1091. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|