Skip Navigation

The World Bank Research Observer 2005 20(1):81-108; doi:10.1093/wbro/lki003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessides, I. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Right arrow L51 - Economics of Regulation
Right arrow L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises; Privatization; Contracting Out
Right arrow H54 - Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Infrastructure Privatization and Regulation: Promises and Perils

Ioannis N. Kessides

Ioannis N. Kessides is Lead Economist in the Development Research Group of the World Bank

Correspondence: His e-mail address is ikessides{at}worldbank.org

Abstract

Infrastructure is crucial for generating growth, alleviating poverty, and increasing international competitiveness. For much of the twentieth century and in most countries, the network utilities that delivered infrastructure services—such as electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, railroads, and water supply—were vertically and horizontally integrated state monopolies. But this approach often resulted in extremely weak services, especially in developing and transition economies and especially for poor people. Common problems included low productivity, high costs, bad quality, insufficient revenue, and shortfalls in investment. Over the past two decades many countries have implemented far-reaching institutional reforms—restructuring, privatizing, and establishing new approaches to regulation. This article identifies the challenges involved in this massive policy redirection within the historical, economic, and institutional context of developing and transition economies. It also reviews the outcomes of these policy changes, including their distributional consequences—especially for poor households and other disadvantaged groups. Drawing on a range of international experiences and empirical studies, it recommends directions for future reforms and research to improve infrastructure performance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Gilbert
Water for All: How To Combine Public Management with Commercial Practice for the Benefit of the Poor?
Urban Stud, July 1, 2007; 44(8): 1559 - 1579.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.