Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J51 - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

ORGANIZED LABOR, POLITICS, AND LABOR MARKET FLEXIBILITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Joan M. Nelson

Organized labor is usually viewed as an obstacle to labor market adjustment. But unions' responses to adjustment programs in fact range from militant opposition to acquiescence or even explicit cooperation. Three sets of variables shape these responses: the strength and characteristics of the union movement itself; economic cycles; and political institutions and their ties to unions.

•Strength of the labor movement: In industrial democracies, an aggressive stance on wages tends to be associated with moderately strong unions. Small or weak unions are less militant, as might be expected; more surprisingly, large and powerful unions also tend to be more moderate, primarily because of their greater participation in consultation and decisionmaking at the national level. The experience in developing countries is somewhat different: only a few of these have strong labor movements, and among these, militancy is common. The large share of wage labor in the public sector complicates comparisons with industrial nations, since governments as employers clearly behave differently from private employers, particularly in hard times.

•Economic cycles: Depression almost invariably reduces militancy in developing as well as industrial nations.

•Political institutions: The nature of the political regime—democratic or authoritarian—is only roughly associated with how governments handle labor relations, and correspondingly with the options available to unions. More important in shaping unions' behavior are the nature of the political party system and how unions are connected with parties. The conditions needed to gain workers' cooperation are analogous to those which encourage business to invest: political stability, a voice in policy that affects their interests, and arising from these, the confidence that current sacrifices will ultimately yield a fair share of future benefits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
J. Aleman
The Politics of Tripartite Cooperation in New Democracies: A Multi-level Analysis
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, March 1, 2009; 30(2): 141 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.