Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Nash, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Right arrow F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

REFORM OF TRADE POLICY: Recent Evidence from Theory and Practice

Vinod Thomas and John Nash

In the 1980s many developing countries began to recognize that restrictive trade policies can constrain growth. To facilitate trade and integration into the world economy, many countries have embarked on reform programs. This survey synthesizes the conclusions of the literature on trade policy reform with those of a recent study by the World Bank analyzing reforms in developing countries, particularly those supported by adjustment lending programs. Its objective is to shed light on some of the questions about these programs to guide policymakers in the future. The article reviews conditions in these countries before trade policy reforms were implemented and examines how much reform actually took place. It also examines the effects of the reforms on economic performance and reviews the factors that constrained the reform process. The survey considers the most important issues in designing and implementing trade policy reforms and concludes that although past reforms have had a positive impact, future programs should emphasize three elements: reducing the level of protection, maintaining macroeconomic stability, and accounting for the conflicts and complementarities with other policies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.