Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLure, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow P35 - Public Economics
Right arrow P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
Right arrow H21 - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

other

A SIMPLER CONSUMPTION-BASED ALTERNATIVE TO THE INCOME TAX FOR SOCIALIST ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION

Charles E. McLure, Jr

The tax systems of socialist economies in transition will distort resource allocation, create inequities, and cause administrative headaches if not reformed. These countries have weak tax administrations, lack experience with mass taxes based on voluntary compliance, and need to encourage domestic saving and foreign investment. This article suggests an alternative to the conventional income tax that is more suited to these conditions.

Attempting to tax real economic income raises complicated timing issues (when to recognize income and allow deductions) and may require complex adjustments for inflation. The simplified alternative tax (SAT) avoids these complications and provides a general incentive for saving and investment less subject to abuse or distortions than tax holidays and other tax gimmicks in vogue in countries emerging from socialism.

The key elements of the SAT are separate taxes on income from labor and capital, immediate deduction for all business expenditures, no deduction for interest, and no taxation of interest or dividends. (Interest could be treated as under an income tax, at some cost.) Although the marginal effective tax rate is zero, the government shares in extraordinary returns to investment. The article discusses potential problems (including distributional implications, tax losses, and foreign tax credits) as well as advantages of the SAT.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.