Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Plas, R. v. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
Right arrow O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

research-article

THE DESIGN AND DIFFUSION OF IMPROVED COOKING STOVES

Douglas F. Barnes, Keith Openshaw, Kirk R. Smith and Robert van der Plas

The poorer half of the world's people have long relied for their energy needs on woodfuels. Since the oil shocks of the 1970s, pressure on forest resources has increased and the costs of traditional use of woodfuels have been growing—to the householder, in cash or collection time, and to society in inefficient energy use, deforestation, and local and global harm to health and the environment. Modern, efficient stoves can alleviate some of these problems; programs to design and disseminate them would seem a worthwhile pursuit for development activity.

But do such programs in fact warrant the investment? Why have so many failed to catch on as expected? The authors find that programs have been most successful when targeted to specific areas where woodfuel prices or collection times are high. Field testing, consumer surveys, and involvement of local artisans from the outset have been critical to the ultimate adoption of the stoves. With these elements in place, external support from governments and donors can be useful; lacking them, subsidies may succeed only in distributing stoves that ultimately molder away unused. This article's review of what makes for success and failure is instructive for the design of stove programs in particular, and of development projects that propagate improved methods and technologies in general.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
J. W. Wakhungu
Gender Issues in Energy Policy & Planning: Perspectives From the Dakar Workshop
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, June 1, 1996; 16(3): 98 - 106.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.