Skip Navigation



The World Bank Research Observer Advance Access published online on September 22, 2007

The World Bank Research Observer, doi:10.1093/wbro/lkm009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/217    most recent
lkm009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, J.
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Using Global Positioning Systems in Household Surveys for Better Economics and Better Policy

John Gibson and David McKenzie

Distance and location are the important determinants of many choices that economists study. Economists often rely on information about these variables that is self-reported by respondents in surveys, although information can sometimes be obtained from secondary sources. Self-reports are typically used for information on distance from households or community centers to roads, markets, schools, clinics, and other public services. There is growing evidence that self-reported distance is measured with error and that these errors are correlated with outcomes of interest. In contrast to self-reports, global positioning systems (GPS) can determine location within 15 m in most cases. The falling cost of GPS receivers makes it increasingly feasible for field surveys to use GPS to more accurately measure location and distance. This article reviews four ways that GPS can lead to better economics and better policy by clarifying policy externalities and spillovers, by improving the understanding of access to services, by improving the collection of household survey data, and by providing data for econometric modeling of the causal impact of policies. Several pitfalls and unresolved problems with using GPS in household surveys are also discussed.

JEL codes: C81, O12, R20


John Gibson is a Professor of Economics at the University of Waikato; his email address is jkgibson{at}mngt.waikato.ac.nz. David McKenzie (corresponding author) is a senior economist in the Development Research Group at the World Bank; his email address is dmckenzie{at}worldbank.org. The authors are grateful to Kathleen Beegle, Chris Bennett, Piet Buys, Geua Boe-Gibson, Alan de Brauw, Uwe Deichmann, John Hoddinott, Ben Olken, Duncan Thomas, John Thyne, three anonymous referees, and participants at the 2007 Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics Conference for helpful comments and advice. This article is dedicated to the memory of Piet Buys, who championed global information system use at the World Bank through his knowledge, enthusiasm, and eagerness to help others use this emerging technology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.