The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 1 (2004), pp. 1-39
The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 1,
© The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK 2004; all rights reserved
Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review
Ghazala Mansuri is economist in the Development Economics Research Group at the World Bank
Vijayendra Rao is senior economist in the Development Research Group at the World Bank
Correspondence: Her e-mail address is gmansuri{at}worldbank.org
Correspondence: His e-mail address is vrao{at}worldbank.org
Abstract
Community-based and -driven development projects have become an important form of development assistance, with the World Bank's portfolio alone approximating $7 billion. A review of their conceptual foundations and evidence on their effectiveness shows that projects that rely on community participation have not been particularly effective at targeting the poor. There is some evidence that such projects create effective community infrastructure, but not a single study establishes a causal relationship between any outcome and participatory elements of a community-based development project. Most such projects are dominated by elites, and both targeting and project quality tend to be markedly worse in more unequal communities. A distinction between potentially "benevolent" forms of elite domination and more pernicious types of capture is likely to be important for understanding project dynamics and outcomes. Several qualitative studies indicate that the sustainability of community-based initiatives depends crucially on an enabling institutional environment, which requires government commitment, and on accountability of leaders to their community to avoid "supply-driven demand-driven" development. External agents strongly influence project success, but facilitators are often poorly trained, particularly in rapidly scaled-up programs. The naive application of complex contextual concepts like participation, social capital, and empowerment is endemic among project implementers and contributes to poor design and implementation. The evidence suggests that community-based and -driven development projects are best undertaken in a context-specific manner, with a long time horizon and with careful and well-designed monitoring and evaluation systems.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Ravallion Decentralizing Eligibility for a Federal Antipoverty Program: A Case Study for China World Bank Econ. Rev., January 30, 2009; (2009) lhn023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. van der Riet Participatory Research and the Philosophy of Social Science: Beyond the Moral Imperative Qualitative Inquiry, June 1, 2008; 14(4): 546 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Mason and V. A. Beard Community-based Planning and Poverty Alleviation in Oaxaca, Mexico Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 245 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Zwane and M. Kremer What Works in Fighting Diarrheal Diseases in Developing Countries? A Critical Review World Bank Res. Obs., May 4, 2007; (2007) lkm002v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. A. Beard and A. Dasgupta Collective Action and Community-driven Development in Rural and Urban Indonesia Urban Stud, August 1, 2006; 43(9): 1451 - 1468. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. John Community development research: Merging (or submerging) communities of practice? A response to Van Vlaenderen Community Dev. J., January 1, 2006; 41(1): 50 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|