Skip Navigation



The World Bank Research Observer Advance Access published online on October 4, 2007

The World Bank Research Observer, doi:10.1093/wbro/lkm010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/77    most recent
lkm010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cadot, O.
Right arrow Articles by de Melo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin

Olivier Cadot and Jaime de Melo

With preferential trade agreements on the rise worldwide rules of origin—which are necessary to prevent trade deflection—are attracting increasing attention. At the same time, preference erosion for Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) recipients is increasing resistance to further multilateral negotiations. Drawing on different approaches, this article shows that the current system of rules of origin that is used by the European Union and the United States in preferential trade agreements (including the GSP) and that is similar to systems used by other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries should be drastically simplified if developed economies really want to help developing economies integrate into the world trading system. In addition to diverting resources for administrative tasks, current rules of origin carry significant compliance costs. More fundamentally, it is becoming increasingly clear that they are often been designed to force developing economies to buy inefficient intermediate products from developed economies to "pay for" preferential access for the final product. The evidence also suggests that a significant share of the rents associated with market access (net of rules of origin compliance costs) is captured by developed economies. Finally, the restrictiveness of rules of origin is found to be beyond the levels that would be justified to prevent trade deflection, suggesting a capture by special interest groups. The article outlines some alternative paths to reforms.

JEL codes: F13, F15


Olivier Cadot is Professor of Economics at the University of Lausanne, associated scholar at Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International (CERDI), and fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); his email address is olivier.cadot@unil.ch. Jaime de Melo (corresponding author) is Professor of Economics at the University of Geneva, associated scholar at CERDI, and fellow at CEPR; his email address is demelo@ecopo.unige.ch. The authors thank Paul Brenton and Marcelo Olarreaga for many useful suggestions and their colleagues and co-authors Céline Carrère, Antoni Estevadeordal, Alberto Portugal-Perez, Akiko Suwa-Eisenmann, and Bolormaa Tumurchudur for permission to draw on joint work. They also thank three referees for comments on a previous draft.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.