<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The World Bank Research Observer - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The World Bank Research Observer - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1564-6971</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>The World Bank Research Observer</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0257-3032</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp018v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp017v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp014v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp010v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scale Economies and Cities]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper summarizes the policy-relevant insights of a generation of research on scale economies. Scale economies in production are of three types: internal economies associated with large plants, localization economies that come from sharing of inputs and infrastructure and from greater competition among firms, and urbanization economies that are generated through diversity and knowledge spillovers. The benefits (and costs) of localization and urbanization are together called "external (dis) economies" because they arise due to factors outside any single household, farm or firm. The empirical literature yields some stylized facts. Internal scale economies are low in light industries and high in heavy industries. External scale economies are amplified by economic density and dissipate with distance from places where economic activity is concentrated. Scale economies are most visibly manifest in towns and cities. To simplify somewhat, towns allow firms and farms to exploit internal scale economies, medium-sized cities help firms in an industry exploit localization economies, and large cities and metropolises provide urbanization economies to those who locate within or nearby. Scale economies have implications for policy makers. The first is that because urban settlements rise and thrive because market agents demand their services, they should be seen as creatures of the market, not creations of the state. The second is that because settlements of different sizes provide differing services, towns, cities, and metropolises are more often complements for one another, not substitutes. Third, as a corollary, policymakers should aim to improve the functioning of urban settlements, and not become preoccupied with their size.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gill, I. S., Goh, C.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:49:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scale Economies and Cities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp018v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Higher Food Prices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Poverty Impact and Policy Responses]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp018v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The spike in global food prices in 2008 led to significantly higher food prices across the developing world. Global commodity prices have since fallen but remain volatile, and local food prices remain high in many countries. The authors review the evidence on the potential impact of higher food prices on poverty, focusing on Sub-Saharan Africa, and examine the extent to which policy responses are able to protect the poor. They show that rising food prices are likely to lead to higher poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa as the negative impact on net consumers outweighs the benefits to producers. A recent survey shows that the most common policy response in Sub-Saharan African countries in 2008 was reducing taxes on food, while outside the region subsidies were the most popular measure. Sub-Saharan African countries also have a higher prevalence of food-based safety net programs, some of which were scaled up to respond to rising prices. The review suggests that the benefits from reducing import tariffs on staples are likely to accrue largely to the nonpoor. Safety net programs can be more effective, but geographic targeting and other investments to strengthen safety nets are necessary to ensure that fewer people are affected by future crises.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wodon, Q., Zaman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:30:07 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Higher Food Prices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Poverty Impact and Policy Responses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp017v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ideas and Innovation in East Asia]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp017v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The generation, diffusion, absorption, and application of new technology, knowledge, or ideas are crucial drivers of development. The authors examine the exceptionally fast growth in domestic innovation efforts in Korea, Taiwan (China), Singapore, and China, drawing on information about R&amp;D as well as patent and patent citations data. They also use the World Bank Investment Climate Surveys to investigate sources of technological innovation in the other middle- and low-income East Asian economies. They then evaluate the role of three main channels for knowledge flows to East Asia&mdash;international trade, acquisition of disembodied knowledge, and foreign direct investment. Results from estimating an international knowledge diffusion model using patent citations data show that, while East Asian innovations continue to draw heavily on knowledge flows from the US and Japan, citations to the same or to other East Asian economies are quickly rising, indicating the emergence of national and regional knowledge stocks as a foundation for innovation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brahmbhatt, M., Hu, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:29:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ideas and Innovation in East Asia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimation of Water Demand in Developing Countries: An Overview]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A better understanding of household water use in developing countries is necessary to manage and expand water systems more effectively. Several meta-analyzes have examined the determinants of household water demand in industrialized countries, but little effort has been made to synthesize the growing body of literature evaluating household water demand in developing countries. This article reviews what is known and what is missing from that literature thus far. Analysis of demand for water in developing countries is complicated by abundant evidence that, contrary to what is observed in most developed countries, households in developing countries have access to, and may use more than one of several types of, water sources. The authors describe the different modeling strategies that researchers have adopted to estimate water demand in developing countries and discuss issues related to data collection. The findings from the literature on the main determinants of water demand in these countries suggest that, despite heterogeneity in the places and time periods studied, most estimates of own-price elasticity of water from private connections are in the range from &ndash;0.3 to &ndash;0.6, close to what is usually reported for industrialized countries. The empirical findings on decisions relating to household water sources are much less robust and should be a high priority for future research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nauges, C., Whittington, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:29:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimation of Water Demand in Developing Countries: An Overview]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction: Additional Evidence]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Agricultural growth has long been recognized as an important instrument for poverty reduction. Yet, measurements of this relationship are still scarce and not always reliable. The authors present additional evidence at both the sectoral and household levels based on recent data. Results show that rural poverty reduction has been associated with growth in yields and in agricultural labor productivity, but that this relation varies sharply across regional contexts. GDP growth originating in agriculture induces income growth among the 40 percent poorest, which is on the order of three times larger than growth originating in the rest of the economy. The power of agriculture comes not only from its direct poverty reduction effect but also from its potentially strong growth linkage effects on the rest of the economy. Decomposing the aggregate decline in poverty into a rural contribution, an urban contribution, and a population shift component shows that rural areas contributed more than half the observed aggregate decline in poverty. Finally, using the example of Vietnam, the authors show that rapid growth in agriculture has opened pathways out of poverty for farming households. While the effectiveness of agricultural growth in reducing poverty is well established, the effectiveness of public investment in inducing agricultural growth is still incomplete and conditional on context.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:00:47 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction: Additional Evidence]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp014v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Policy Reforms Affecting Agricultural Incentives: Much Achieved, Much Still Needed]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp014v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>For decades, earnings from farming in many developing countries have been depressed by a pro-urban bias in own-country policies, as well as by governments of richer countries favoring their farmers with import barriers and subsidies. Both sets of policies reduce national and global economic welfare and inhibit agricultural trade and economic growth. They almost certainly add to inequality and poverty in developing countries, since three-quarters of the world's billion poorest people depend on farming for their livelihood. During the past two decades, however, numerous developing country governments have reduced their sectoral and trade policy distortions, while some high-income countries also have begun reducing market-distorting aspects of their farm policies. The author surveys the changing extent of policy distortions to prices faced by developing-country farmers over the past half century, and provides a summary of new empirical estimates from a global economy-wide model that yield estimates of how much could be gained by removing the interventions remaining as of 2004. The author concludes by pointing to the scope and prospects for further pro-poor policy reform in both developing and high-income countries.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:00:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Policy Reforms Affecting Agricultural Incentives: Much Achieved, Much Still Needed]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Mitigate or to Adapt: Is that the Question? Observations on an Appropriate Response to the Climate Change Challenge to Development Strategies]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Climate change is a new and important challenge to development strategies. In light of the current literature a framework for assessing responses to this challenge is provided. The presence of climate change makes it necessary to at least review development strategies&mdash;even in apparently nonclimate-sensitive and nonpolluting sectors. There is a need for an integrated portfolio of actions ranging from avoiding emissions (mitigation) to coping with impacts (adaptation) and to consciously accepting residual damages. Proactive (<I>ex ante</I>) adaptation is critical, but subject to risks of regrets when the magnitude or location of damages is uncertain. Uncertainty on location favors nonsite-specific actions, or reactive (<I>ex post</I>) adaptation. However, some irreversible losses cannot be compensated for. Thus, mitigation might be in many cases the cheapest long-term solution to climate change problems and the most important to avoid thresholds that may trigger truly catastrophic consequences. To limit the risks that budget constraints prevent developing countries from financing reactive adaptation&mdash;especially since climate shocks might erode the fiscal base&mdash;"rainy-day funds" may have to be developed within countries and at the global level for transfer purposes. Finally, more research is required on the impacts of climate change, on modeling the interrelations between mitigation and adaptation, and on operationalizing the framework.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shalizi, Z., Lecocq, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:13:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Mitigate or to Adapt: Is that the Question? Observations on an Appropriate Response to the Climate Change Challenge to Development Strategies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nuclear Power and Sustainable Energy Policy: Promises and Perils]]></title>
<link>http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/lkp010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The author examines the challenges and opportunities of nuclear power in meeting the projected large absolute increase in energy demand, especially electricity, throughout the industrialized and developing world, while helping to mitigate the threat of climate change. A significant global nuclear power deployment would engender serious risks related to proliferation, safety, and waste disposal. Unlike renewable sources of energy, nuclear power is an unforgiving technology because human lapses and errors can have ecological and social impacts that are catastrophic and irreversible. However, according to some analysts, advances in the design of nuclear reactors may have reduced their associated risks and improved their performance. Moreover, while a variety of renewable energy sources (hydro, wind, modern biomass, solar) will play important roles in the transition to a low-carbon economy, some analysts perceive that nuclear power is the only proven technology for generating electricity that is both largely carbon-free, not location specific (as with wind, hydro and solar), and amenable to significant scaling up. Thus given the projections of threats from climate change, and if the considerable strain experienced by world energy markets in recent years is a harbinger of things to come, then there is a rationale for examining the pros and cons of nuclear power as a supply option within low-carbon strategies. It should be noted that despite the emerging centrality of climate change and security of supply in the energy policy debate, nuclear power is still viewed with a great deal of skepticism and in fact continues to elicit considerable opposition. Indeed the views on nuclear power in the context of sustainable energy policy are highly divergent. A thorough evaluation of all aspects of the issue is warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kessides, I. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:34:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/wbro/lkp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nuclear Power and Sustainable Energy Policy: Promises and Perils]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The World Bank</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>